Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Linked In :) vs. Google+ :|

So I just made a Linked In profile (Linked...in), after countless emails from people that I've known for a while and have my email addresses. I always thought it was just an extra thing that was unnecessary since I had a Facebook. But then I thought that about Twitter, and I'm actually enjoying it more than I thought I would, so go figure.

But more and more, as I grow my professional persona on the Internet, I thought I should at least make one for now. Considering I'm going to be at UC Santa Barbara for a while. It is something that can be completely separate from Facebook, and I haven't seen one a place where it can integrated at all, in fact. So something that I thought would be entirely useless to my online persona, in addition to my personal academic website, looks like it could be an asset that Facebook can't be. I can be myself on Facebook, but with Linked In and Twitter, I can be a more reserved, patient person. I'm glad I got one. (One complaint: Too much going on the main home page when I log in; a bit overwhelming!)

This brings me to my next point: The terribleness and uselessness of Google+. As with many Internet junkies, I was able to get on (thanks to Gmail) and send out invites and such. Every person I was connected to on Google+, was a friend on Facebook. The lack of options. The ugliness of the UI. The inability to post on other folk's wall. I thought, "I can only comment on other's thoughts? What if there is something spontaneous that I want to mention?" I found, as so many others reviewing it did as well, the only redeeming quality was the "Circles" part. One could conceivably talk behind the backs of their family to their friends. (I'm not promoting this practice.) My point is that different message could be directed solely at the appropriate circles. Makes a whole lotta sense. But that was it. I only saw it as Facebook Lite that was connected to my Google Account.

At this very moment, there are few posts in my "feed" and they are all from one person (sorry, Barb!). These posts also span the entire month of August. Granted, it is newer and possibly I'm not giving it a chance, but honestly, I have all my friends on FB and I'm not sure why I should migrate over to G+. It also seems, for obvious reasons, Android heavy. However, this won't be a good idea when the iPhone is released on all major US carriers this year or next. While a decent platform, it is too varied the market is flooded to compete with iOS devices. A social networking service that has Android-specific features is not going to catch on with the general consumer base.

My prediction is that it will be a similar story to Google Buzz, albeit minus some of the privacy concerns. In about a year, I expect FB will still be 1B strong, while G+ will be waning in traffic.

My final thoughts: FB good, just keep it private, and be yourself; Twitter is really fun; Linked In good for the professional inside many of us; Google+, major suckitude.

I don't think I'll be using it again if my friend-base remains the same as my FB friend-base.